This case concerned an charm in opposition to acquittal in an illegal dispossession matter. The court observed which the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, didn't have retrospective impact, and no cognizance of offences of illegal dispossession prior to the Act’s promulgation can be taken. The UPA accused this group of triggering https://hire-cancellation-of-docu60996.csublogs.com/37440290/top-latest-five-affordable-cancellation-of-documents-advocate-in-karachi-urban-news